Safety and efficacy of a dose-dense short-term therapy in patients with MYC-translocated aggressive lymphoma.

Patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and MYC rearrangement at fluorescence in situ hybridization exhibit poor outcome after R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone). In the last decade, 68 patients with Burkitt lymphoma ([BL] n = 46) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma ([HGBCL] single, double, or triple hit; n = 22) were treated with a dose-dense, short-term therapy termed "CARMEN regimen" at 5 Italian centers. Forty-six (68%) patients were HIV+. CARMEN included a 36-day induction with sequential, single weekly doses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, rituximab, methotrexate, etoposide, and doxorubicin plus intrathecal chemotherapy, followed by high-dose-cytarabine-based consolidation. Patients who did not achieve complete remission (CR) after induction received BEAM (carmustina, etoposide, cytarabine, melfalan)-conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after consolidation. Sixty-one (90%) patients completed induction, and 59 (87%) completed consolidation. Seventeen patients received ASCT. Grade 4 hematological toxicity was common but did not cause treatment discontinuation; grade 4 nonhematological toxicity was recorded in 11 (16%) patients, with grade 4 infections in 6 (9%). Six (9%) patients died of toxicity (sepsis in 4, COVID-19, acute respiratory distress syndrome). CR rate after the whole treatment was 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55% to 91%) for patients with HGBCL and 78% (95% CI, 66% to 90%) for patients with BL. At a median follow-up of 65 (interquartile range, 40-109) months, 48 patients remain event free, with a 5-year progression-free survival of 63% (95% CI, 58% to 68%) for HGBCL and 72% (95% CI, 71% to 73%) for BL, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 63% (95% CI, 58% to 68%) and 76% (95% CI, 75% to 77%), respectively. HIV seropositivity did not have a detrimental effect on outcome. This retrospective study shows that CARMEN is a safe and active regimen both in HIV-negative and -positive patients with MYC-rearranged lymphomas. Encouraging survival figures, attained with a single dose of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, deserve further investigation in HGBCL and other aggressive lymphomas.

Feasibility and safety of outpatient administration of ifosfamide and etoposide for pediatric patients with Ewing sarcoma in a resource-limited setting amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: To assess feasibility and safety of outpatient administration of ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) for pediatric Ewing sarcoma (EWS) patients in a resource-limited setting amid the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with EWS who received outpatient IE from January 2020 until January 2021 at our institution. Ifosfamide 1800 mg/m2 was given for 5 days with MESNA (2-mercaptoethane sulfonate sodium) infusion and additional boluses before and after 9 hours of hydration. Patients >10 years of age with the ability to drink orally at home, no pre-existing renal dysfunction or history of hematuria were included. They were monitored for hemorrhagic cystitis with a urine dipstick before, midway, and at end of infusion. A urine analysis was done 24 hours after the last dose of ifosfamide. RESULTS: Forty-seven (100%) cycles were given as outpatient during the study period. Thirty-five (74%) cycles were given on time, two (4%) cycles were delayed due to mucositis, two (4%) due to delayed count recovery, and eight (18%) due to unavailability of outpatient appointments. The median interval between these cycles was 15 days (range 14-44 days). No episode of hemorrhagic cystitis was reported. Urine analysis was not done at 24 hours for 27 (58%) cycles, so microscopic hematuria may have been missed. This outpatient protocol saved 32% (USD 299) per cycle in cost and 282 days of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Outpatient administration of IE for pediatric patients with EWS is feasible, safe, and cost-effective during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cyclophosphamide plus etoposide is a safe and effective mobilization regimen in patients with multiple myeloma.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is a major component in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. As a prerequisite, the successful collection of a sufficient number of viable peripheral blood hematopoietic CD34+ cells is critical. A common standard protocol for mobilization is currently not defined and critically discussed especially in German-speaking Europe. In times of the Covid-19 pandemic, safe and effective strategies have to be chosen to minimize hospitalization times and severe courses. In this single-center retrospective analysis, safety and efficacy of cyclophosphamide plus etoposide (CE) and growth-factor support (n = 33) was compared to cyclophosphamide mono treatment and growth-factor support (n = 49) in 82 patients with multiple myeloma at first diagnosis. CE was superior to cyclophosphamide mono with a significantly higher number of collected CD34+ cells (15.46 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg vs. 9.92 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg), significantly faster engraftment of granulocytes after stem cell transplantation (day 10.5 vs. day 11.6), shorter duration of the inpatient stay (17.47 days vs. 19.16 days) and significantly less transfusions (8.82 % vs. 30.61 % patients receiving transfusions). The safety profile was comparable in both groups and in line with published data. We conclude that CE is a safe and highly effective mobilization protocol in patients with multiple myeloma at first diagnosis and appears to be superior to the commonly used cyclophosphamide mono regimen.

Four Cycles of Etoposide plus Cisplatin for Patients with Good-Risk Advanced Germ Cell Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends either three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin or four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EPx4) as initial chemotherapy for the treatment of good-risk germ cell tumors (GCTs). To assess the response, toxicity, and survival outcomes of EPx4, we analyzed our experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Response and survival outcomes, selected toxicities, and adherence to chemotherapy dose and schedule were assessed in patients with good-risk GCT who received EPx4 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1982 and 2016. The results were compared with our past results and published data. RESULTS: Between 1982 and 2016, 944 patients with GCT were treated with EPx4, 289 who were previously reported plus 655 treated between January 2000 and August 2016. A favorable response was achieved in 928 of 944 patients (98.3%). Five-year progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival rates were 93.9%, 98.6%, and 97.9%, respectively. Median follow-up was 7.3 years (range, 2.8 months to 35.5 years). Viable, nonteratomatous malignant GCT was present in 3.5% of 432 postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimens from patients with nonseminomatous GCT. Febrile neutropenia and thromboembolic events occurred in 16.0% and 8.9%, respectively, with one treatment-related death. In the more recent 655-patient cohort, full-dose EPx4 was administered to 631 (96.3%), with deviations from planned treatment driven mainly by vascular (n = 13), hematologic (n = 11), renal (n = 7), or infectious (n = 5) events. CONCLUSION: EPx4 is highly effective and well tolerated in patients with good-risk GCTs and remains a standard of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EPx4) is a standard-of-care regimen for all patients with good-risk germ cell tumors with a favorable response rate and disease-specific survival of 98%. Full-dose administration of etoposide and cisplatin and complete resection of residual disease lead to optimal outcomes. EPx4 should be the recommended regimen in active smokers, patients with reduced or borderline kidney function, and patients aged 50 years or older, which are patient groups at increased risk for bleomycin pulmonary toxicity. Because of a risk of acquired severe pulmonary illness, EPx4 may also be favored for patients who vape or use e-cigarettes and during ongoing transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.